Data Sources
Starter (required only): stage, amount, and close-date history, plus what the last calls covered and what was left open.
Full (required + recommended): the same, plus what happened between calls. Who replied and who went quiet, what threads are still unanswered, and what your own team said internally about the deal.
See the Context Graph for how each source feeds the answer.
Choose your path
Build in Claude or ChatGPT
Deal status is the most natural question to just ask, so this is the path most teams start with. A manager mid-review, a rep before one, a CRO reading into a deal they have not seen.The Prompt
Open Claude or ChatGPT with the Clearskies MCP connected and paste this (or modify to your needs). Replace the account name and the window with your own.Make it yours
- Swap the window:
since the last review,since Monday,since the deal entered this stage. - Add
Compare what the rep said in our last 1:1 against what the record showswhen you are preparing a coaching conversation rather than a deal review. - Add
List the three questions I should ask in the review that the record cannot answerto turn the output into an agenda. - Add
Do this for every deal in committo run the same read across a forecast category.
The Skill (Claude)
Two skills in the Clearskies plugin for Claude cover the two ways this question gets asked.clearskies:deal-review audits a deal against its risk signals: champion engagement, economic buyer status, unanswered communications, close-date health, deal velocity. Use it when the question behind “what changed” is really “what is going wrong.”
clearskies:deal-strategy works a stuck or complex deal from first principles: the real buyer, the real blocker, what has to be true to close, and whether to push the date or qualify out. Use it when the status read is finished and the question is what to do about it.
Trigger phrases
- “What changed on [account] since the last review”
- “Review the [account] deal”
- “Walk me through where [account] stands”
Customize it for your team
- Match the output to the structure your deal reviews already use
- Set the default window to your review cadence, weekly or biweekly
- Name the signals your team treats as red flags so they always surface
Build in Clearskies
For teams who would rather the answer be waiting than have to ask for it. Build the workflow once and a status read on every deal in a chosen set lands before the review.The Workflow
In the Clearskies app, open the workflow builder and describe what you want in plain language:Deploy to Slack
Once published, each deal in scope arrives as its own message:Customize the rollout
- Choose the deals in scope: a forecast category, a stage, a threshold, one rep’s book
- Set the cadence to match your review rhythm and the channel to match where reviews happen
- Send one message per deal, or a single digest, depending on volume
- Add the signals your team treats as red flags so they always appear
- Chain it with 1:1 prep so managers get the same read on their reps’ deals before each conversation
Related
- Pipeline Risk Detection — deal risk alerts that fire without being asked, complementary to the on-demand read here
The Plugin
Ready to make this part of your team’s workflow? We’ll set up the Clearskies plugin with you. Clearskies workflows, Claude skills, all tailored to how your team works. Book 15 minutes →Next steps
- Sign in to Clearskies
- Connect your data sources
- Get your Clearskies MCP server and try with Claude or ChatGPT